Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 23 24 [25] 26 27 28   Go Down

Author Topic: After the Landing  (Read 281055 times)

Chris Johnson

  • T5
  • *****
  • Posts: 1069
  • Trying to give a fig but would settle for $100,000
Re: After the Landing
« Reply #360 on: July 20, 2013, 12:12:30 PM »

I don't want to really ask this next question but bearing in mind the blog's hypothesis.......If the plane ditched into the sea would the same apply?
Logged

richie conroy

  • T5
  • *****
  • Posts: 1412
Re: After the Landing
« Reply #361 on: July 20, 2013, 12:51:30 PM »

Also was the wheel bay sealed off from rest of wing ? I would imagine if it weren't one wing filling up would drag the plane off rocks an down the reef face.

Thanks Richie
We are an echo of the past


Member# 416
 
Logged

richie conroy

  • T5
  • *****
  • Posts: 1412
Re: After the Landing
« Reply #362 on: July 20, 2013, 02:34:04 PM »

Another thing is for water to reach top of extra tanks in cabin the wings and engine would have already been submerged , Also the side cockpit windows were sliding one's so if nose was facing waves it would have filled cockpit first in my opinion

Thank's Richie
We are an echo of the past


Member# 416
 
Logged

tom howard

  • T2
  • **
  • Posts: 87
Re: After the Landing
« Reply #363 on: July 23, 2013, 08:52:54 PM »

After reading Mr.Manley's rant on the failure of the Coast Guard on his website, I noticed this tidbit in bold, which is close
to a similar raving he has made here at Tighar in earlier posts. But with a new twist added, now he has Earhart telling the Coast Guard her backup plan was Gardner island, which they ignored of course.
Is this complete hogwash or what? I can find no reference to anywhere "in writing and before the flight" that Earhart
ever mentioned the name Gardner.


"AE, in writing and before the flight, told the USCG what frequencies to use. She told them what schedule to use for transmission and reception. She told them what time zone to use. She told them what her backup landing site was (Gardner),"
Logged

Martin X. Moleski, SJ

  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 2955
Re: After the Landing
« Reply #364 on: July 23, 2013, 10:29:09 PM »

... now he has Earhart telling the Coast Guard her backup plan was Gardner island, which they ignored of course.
Is this complete hogwash or what? I can find no reference to anywhere "in writing and before the flight" that Earhart
ever mentioned the name Gardner.

That's my impression, too.

Randy Jacobson summarizes the communications made in preparation for the second attempt.  The summary is based on the Jacobson Databases of all of the radio traffic that he could find related to the case.  There isn't a syllable that I can remember about any plan B, let alone one specifying Gardner Island.

I've heard it said that Doris Rich said that Gore Vidal said that Amelia said she would turn back to the Gilberts if the could not find Howland.  No one has been able to substantiate Rich's claim so far. 
LTM,

           Marty
           TIGHAR #2359A
 
Logged

Ric Gillespie

  • Executive Director
  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 5543
  • "Do not try. Do or do not. There is no try" Yoda
Re: After the Landing
« Reply #365 on: July 24, 2013, 10:19:26 AM »

Lloyd Manley's ramblings have come in for scathing criticism in postings that are too colorful to post on this forum.  Let it suffice to say that Mr. Manley is not credible.  Let's move on.
Logged

Ric Gillespie

  • Executive Director
  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 5543
  • "Do not try. Do or do not. There is no try" Yoda
Re: After the Landing
« Reply #366 on: July 24, 2013, 10:26:51 AM »

The Return-to-the-Gilberts (aka Plan B) has been debated ad nauseum.  Whether or not Earhart ever mentioned it as an alternative, it would be utterly unworkable; there is no evidence that she tried it; and there is primary source evidence (Itasca radio log: "We are on the line....") that she did something else.  Unless someone has new evidence to support that hypothesis, I don't think we need to spend time flogging that dead horse.
Logged

Christine Schulte

  • T1
  • *
  • Posts: 21
Re: After the Landing
« Reply #367 on: July 24, 2013, 02:18:40 PM »

I think that the remark about returning to the Gilberts (if AE really made such a remark - as has been noticed before, a third-hand account isn't really satusfactory evidence at all) should be considered in the light of how AE is known to have handled the risks involved in her previous flights. Her attitude seems to have been "all or nothing", and she never seems to have made any serious contingency planning. When she felt that her planes were too heavy, safety equipment was the first thing she discarded. Even on her transatlantic flight in 1932, she didn't carry a life raft. When friends asked her how she felt about the risks, she usually laughed them off. 
Also, she doesn't seem to have been very knowledgeable about the routes she flew. In 1932, she had someone else do the detailed planning for her, and stuck to a compass heading because she felt a great circle route was too difficult to handle. She seems to not really have known where she was when she landed. When she had a navigator with her, she seems to have been content to fly whatever course he set.
So even if she actually told Gore Vidal she'd head back to the Gilberts, I think  it's fair to assume she hadn't really thought it through.
Logged

Gloria Walker Burger

  • TIGHAR member
  • *
  • Posts: 92
Re: After the Landing
« Reply #368 on: July 24, 2013, 02:29:12 PM »

Your turn to put it all together and write your own scenario. Try to keep it on topic, it's all theory and we are not trying to argue points or tear ideas apart. If you have a scenario of what happened after the last known radio call lets see it!

This thread was originally for fun to see forum members' ideas of their own scenario of what happened to Amelia and Fred--without "tearing ideas apart".

What's your scenario?
Gloria
TIGHAR #3760
 
Logged

Brano Lacika

  • T1
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Re: After the Landing
« Reply #369 on: July 24, 2013, 02:31:45 PM »

I think that the remark about returning to the Gilberts (if AE really made such a remark - as has been noticed before, a third-hand account isn't really satusfactory evidence at all) should be considered in the light of how AE is known to have handled the risks involved in her previous flights. Her attitude seems to have been "all or nothing", and she never seems to have made any serious contingency planning. When she felt that her planes were too heavy, safety equipment was the first thing she discarded. Even on her transatlantic flight in 1932, she didn't carry a life raft. When friends asked her how she felt about the risks, she usually laughed them off. 
Also, she doesn't seem to have been very knowledgeable about the routes she flew. In 1932, she had someone else do the detailed planning for her, and stuck to a compass heading because she felt a great circle route was too difficult to handle. She seems to not really have known where she was when she landed. When she had a navigator with her, she seems to have been content to fly whatever course he set.
So even if she actually told Gore Vidal she'd head back to the Gilberts, I think  it's fair to assume she hadn't really thought it
through.

The question is also, if she would really interested in having the backup plan, what the best one could be. Gilbertese islands does not sound verz promising... if they could not find the howland it means, they do not know their position. Flying back from the unknown position does not sound very reasonably and flying upright (vertically) towards the chain of islands is just reallz only the count upon the good luck. Achieving the Howland LOP and the flying alongwith to south is much more promising.
Logged

David Deusenberry

  • T1
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: After the Landing
« Reply #370 on: August 02, 2013, 01:09:19 PM »

Just a thought.
Ok, so Amelia was an alright pilot but Fred was a very good navigator. I’m positive he KNEW where they were. So why would they fly 400 miles past their target? Yes, I do believe they were on Gardener Island and that they died there. My question is why. One possible answer. Our government asks them to. “Hey, Gardner is bigger and has a great place to land. Once you are “lost” we will launch a search that will give us an opportunity to photograph the Japanese progress on neighboring islands and once we are finished we will “find” you and bring fuel so you can be on your way.” But something goes terribly wrong, an unusually high tide washes the Electra off the beach. When the rescue plane flies over a week or so later the Electra isn’t there. “OH CRAP! Let’s pull out and pretend this whole thing never happened.”
Any thoughts?
Logged

Irvine John Donald

  • T5
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
Re: After the Landing
« Reply #371 on: August 02, 2013, 01:25:43 PM »

Ghost

Interesting. I don't believe the US military needed to be secretive about looking at all of these islands. Sending a major aircraft carrier to the area to search for her I do not believe required formal permission from any other country.  The fact that a runway was built on Howland for AE and never ever used was a colossal waste of money but if the US wanted a presence in the area they would have built it for AE but used it during the war. 

I think intentionally getting lost is interesting but I also believe AE would have rebelled at "getting lost" as it would be a mark on her professional reputation. She would have come up with something more creative I'm sure.  All IMHO.
Respectfully Submitted;

Irv
 
Logged

Matt Revington

  • TIGHAR member
  • *
  • Posts: 294
  • member #4155
Re: After the Landing
« Reply #372 on: August 02, 2013, 01:31:29 PM »

While this is meant to be a speculative thread there are many dubious propositions in your post.

As far as I know there was no Japanese activity in or around the Phoenix group at that time so there was no reason to send AE and FN there.  There seemed to some competition between the British and Americans for the Phoenix group but I don't think there were any official restrictions to traveling there so sending them there in secretive manner does not make any sense to me .  Any Japanese activity was hundreds or thousands of miles to the northwest in the Gilberts or Marshalls.  It is extremely doubtful given the quality of maps available that the US government or anyone else was aware that there was a good strip of reef to land the Electra on at Gardner.  etc
« Last Edit: August 02, 2013, 02:15:52 PM by Matt Revington »
Logged

Stacy Galloway

  • T2
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: After the Landing
« Reply #373 on: August 02, 2013, 01:39:57 PM »

Just a thought.
Ok, so Amelia was an alright pilot but Fred was a very good navigator. I’m positive he KNEW where they were. So why would they fly 400 miles past their target? Yes, I do believe they were on Gardener Island and that they died there. My question is why. One possible answer. Our government asks them to. “Hey, Gardner is bigger and has a great place to land. Once you are “lost” we will launch a search that will give us an opportunity to photograph the Japanese progress on neighboring islands and once we are finished we will “find” you and bring fuel so you can be on your way.” But something goes terribly wrong, an unusually high tide washes the Electra off the beach. When the rescue plane flies over a week or so later the Electra isn’t there. “OH CRAP! Let’s pull out and pretend this whole thing never happened.”
Any thoughts?

I believe if that were the case, then the government would not only do a quick flyover, but would also send a bunch of folks to the island to search for her on foot. They would not lose track of her and then not a do a full fledged search to find her.

But I do not believe this is a government conspiracy gone wrong. Sometimes things happen for no understandable reason- or at least no reason that we currently understand. The answers may or may not come, but if they do, I doubt a government cover-up is behind this disappearance.

LTM~ Who says accidents happen,
Stacy
TIGHAR #4284R
 
Logged

Bruce Thomas

  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 647
  • Now where did I put my glasses?
Re: After the Landing
« Reply #374 on: August 02, 2013, 02:15:46 PM »

LTM,

Bruce
TIGHAR #3123R
 
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 23 24 [25] 26 27 28   Go Up
 

Copyright 2019 by TIGHAR, a non-profit foundation. No portion of the TIGHAR Website may be reproduced by xerographic, photographic, digital or any other means for any purpose. No portion of the TIGHAR Website may be stored in a retrieval system, copied, transmitted or transferred in any form or by any means, whether electronic, mechanical, digital, photographic, magnetic or otherwise, for any purpose without the express, written permission of TIGHAR. All rights reserved.

Contact us at: info@tighar.org • Phone: 610-467-1937 • Membership formwebmaster@tighar.org

Powered by MySQL SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines Powered by PHP