| 2-6-S-21a |
2-6-S-21b |
2-6-S-16 |
2-6-S-18 |
|
|
|
|
|
These
are the glass fragments which we suspect are beachcombed objects which
were used as cutting tools by the castaway. They are currently in the
custody of Dr. Rob Jackson, an archaeologist in California with extensive
experience in the evaluation of prehistoric tools. Here's an excerpt
from his preliminary report:
I have had an opportunity to
take only a quick look at each of the glass artifacts so far. None appear
to have secondary flaking (retouch) or obvious micro-flaking that may
reflect heavy use. ...
Microflaking would not be expected for an unmodified flake tool that
was used to cut soft material --- even butchering. Anyone who knows
how to butcher properly would avoid cutting into bone and damaging the
tool edge. In other words, there is no obvious evidence of modification
of the glass for use as tools. I looked at the newsletter sent with
the glass artifacts and noted that some of the descriptions stated that
the glass artifacts can be held "comfortably" or "safely" in the hand.
I would caution against the "ease of prehension" argument, which I sometimes
see in reports. Five million years of evolution have resulted in hands
that accommodate all sorts of shapes.
I will examine each artifact and describe the fracture patterns as well
as both macro and micro wear, including striations that may reflect
use. |
| 2-6-S-43 |
2-6-S-21f |
2-6-S-32 |
Identified: Anode Plate |
|
|
These artifacts appear
to be internal components of one or more radio vacuum tubes. Although
the exact tube or tubes they come from have not yet been pinned down,
there is little doubt that we now know, in a general sense, where these
things came from. The tubes were far too large to be associated with any
of the radios aboard Earhart’s Electra and it seems most likely that they
were burned out or otherwise unserviceable components from the wartime
Coast Guard Loran station which were brought to the Seven Site and used
for informal target practice. We know, both from anecdotal accounts and
from M-1 carbine shell casings and pieces of shattered dinner plates –
one with the Coast Guard logo – that such activity took place at the
site on at least one occasion. At this time at least, it does not look
like the “Hi-tech”artifacts are part of the castaway puzzle. |
|
These continue to
utterly confound attempts to identify them. The closest we have been able
to come is to note their apparent resemblance to fasteners seen in a low-resolution
internet photo of a sextant box in a Portuguese collection. If that is what
they are it could be an important link to the castaway, but the jury is still
very much out on this question. As always, more research is needed. |
In addition to the various artifacts, a considerable amount of faunal material
– fish bones and scales, clam shells, turtle bones, and bird bones –
was recovered from the Seven Site. These were found in what appear to be
meal sites and often show evidence of association with fire. Dr. King has
distributed the faunal material to various experts for analysis so that
we might learn what we can about just how many and what sort of critters
were being eaten and how they were prepared. With that knowledge we should
be able to make an informed judgement about whether we are looking at lunch
leftovers from a Gibertese work party or the last meals of the castaway.
So far, we’re seeing evidence of activity that is much more consistent with
what might be expected of an inexpert person from a European/American culture
than that of Pacific islanders.
Two deposits of
clam (Tridacna) shells, representing exactly 15 clams in each,
were found at the site and, as described in the November TIGHAR Tracks,
some of the shells were broken rather than pried open. We have since learned
that island people rarely harvest the whole clam and carry it home. The
clams are hard to pry off the bottom but the bigger ones can’t fully close
their shell so the islanders just remove the meat and leave the shell
in the water. Equally interesting
are the results of expert analysis of the turtle remains we found at the
site. It looks like we have a single animal, which would match Gerald
Gallagher’s description of the castaway campsite: “Body had obviously
been lying under a ‘ren’ tree and remains of fire, turtle and dead birds
appear to indicate life.” It was probably a Green Sea Turtle (but DNA
testing will tell us for sure) in the neighborhood of maybe 200 pounds
but the odd thing is that the head and limbs are missing. This suggests
that the turtle was butchered where it was found and killed – probably
out on the beach while laying eggs – and only the meat and shell brought
to the site. Island peoples, in contrast to their clam practices, usually
carry the whole turtle, still alive, back home and keep it on its back
until they’re ready to cook it and eat it.
A sample of charcoal
from the site is in New Zealand for radiocarbon dating. This certainly
won’t pin down whether the fire dates from 1937 or 1940, but will tell
us if we’re looking at a prehistoric site and assuming that it's much
more recent.
Archaeology is a
painstaking and often frustrating process, and as we’ve often said, the
real discoveries usually happen in laboratories and archives, not in the
field. Bit by bit, the picture of what happened at the Seven Site is starting
to come together. So far, the best candidate for the star of this pilot
episode of Survivor is still Amelia Earhart, but much work remains
to be done.
Your continued support
makes it possible. Thank you.
|