Sextant box found on Nikumaroro: Difference between revisions

From Ameliapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
(document move of Naval Observatory calibration function to Norfolk)
Line 50: Line 50:
In the engraving on the sextants, there is a symbol for the Naval Observatory between "U.S. Navy" and the number issued by the Naval Observatory.  The symbol is an "N" superimposed on a square "O".  The symbol is relatively clear in [[:File:2975engrave.jpg|this photograph.]]
In the engraving on the sextants, there is a symbol for the Naval Observatory between "U.S. Navy" and the number issued by the Naval Observatory.  The symbol is an "N" superimposed on a square "O".  The symbol is relatively clear in [[:File:2975engrave.jpg|this photograph.]]


All the nautical instrument repair and calibration work was shipped off to Norfolk in the early 1950s.
All the nautical instrument repair and calibration work was shipped off to Norfolk in the early 1950s. <blockquote>"Important though this work was, the Observatory was open to the criticism, especially from astronomers, that navigational instruments should be no part of the work of an astronomical observatory.  This was undoubtedly part of the reason that the chronometer function was transferred in 1951 to the Norfolk Navy Yard, leaving only a small group of instrument makers who repaired and constructed the Observatory’s telescopes and other instrumentation, rather than navigational instruments."<ref>''Sky and Ocean Joined:  The U.S. Naval Observatory, 1830-2000'', by Steven J. Dick, Cambridge University Press, 2003.</ref></blockquote>


Any sextant marked "FE Brandis" is definitely a pre-1925 or so product.
Any sextant marked "FE Brandis" is definitely a pre-1925 or so product.

Revision as of 23:48, 10 December 2011

Pensacola sextant, top view (3547/173).
Loaned by Fred Noonan to a student.

When Gallagher did a thorough search of the area near where the skull was found, he discovered an empty sextant box with two numbers on it--3500 and 1542. The British saw no significance in the numbers; in 2009, TIGHAR found an intriguing pattern of dual numbers (maker's number and U.S. Naval Observatory numbers assigned when the instruments were inspected there).

The Brandis sextant boxes pictured here are approximately 10" x 10" x 5".

Notes from the bones file

Telegram No. 71 from Gallagher to Jack Barley, Resident Commissioner, Ocean Island, Sept. 23, 1940
Sextant box has two numbers on it 3500 ( stencilled ) and 1542--sextant being old fashioned and probably painted over with black enamel.[1]
Typed note in file 4439-40 (23) from Vaskess to Sir Harry, April 11, 1941
The sextant box with its contents is now with me. Perhaps Captain Nasmyth might be willing to examine this with a view to ascertaining the origin?
Letter – circled 14. Vaskess to Commander G.B. Nasmyth, F.R. Met. Soc., Suva. June 6, 1941.
Dear Commander Nasmyth,
With reference to our telephone conversation relative to the identification of a sextant and box which I mentioned as having been found and which you were so good as to say you would examine, I regret to state that on further examination it was discovered that no sextant had actually been found but only a box thought to have contained a sextant.
I am forwarding the box to you with this letter and His Excellency would be grateful if you would examine it with a view to determining its use and origin if possible.
Sincerely,
Secretary to the High Commission
Typed note to file 4439-40 in red ink (39). Sir Harry to Vaskess. August 8, 1941.
Sec., H.C.,
I return the sextant box which I had retrieved from Captain Nasmyth in order to show it to Mr. Gatty who has expert knowledge of such matters. Mr. Gatty thinks that the box is an English one of some age and judges that it was used latterly merely as a receptacle. He does not consider that it could in any circumstance have been a sextant box used in modern trans-Pacific aviation. 2. What was Captain Nasmyth's opinion of it?
Note to file 4439-40 (40). MacDonald to Vaskess (passed along to Sir Harry)
The Secretary
Mnt (39), para. 2, I have spoken to Captain Nasmyth who replied as follows:- "As the sextant box has no distinguishing marks, & since it was discovered that no sextant had been found, all I have been able to find out is that the make of the box – that is – the dovetailing of the corners – makes it appear to be of French origin."

Dovetailed sextant boxes

"Dovetail joints for the corners had by the 1920s given way to comb (finger) joints, but as some later American aircraft cases used corner rebates, which are much easier to make without special machinery."[1]

Tofiga's recollection

Tofiga said he had seen a sextant box on Vaskess' credenza. Tofiga was not taken into the confidences of the WPHC officers who examined the materials sent to Fiji from Gardner Island, but it seems very likely that the box he saw was the one Gallagher sent to Suva.

What might 3500 and 1542 mean?

Brandis #3987; N.O. #1584

The sextant box found on Nikumaroro and shipped to Fiji in 1941 had two numbers on it: 3500 and 1542.[2] TIGHAR has recently found a plausible explanation for those two numbers. The first is likely to be the maker's number; the second a number inscribed on the instrument when it was inspected at the U.S. Naval Observatory.

Fred Noonan loaned a naval sextant to a student of his prior to the fatal flight. That sextant box is extant and also has two numbers handwritten on the bottom of it: 3547 and 173. But the sextant inside the box is a Ludolph with a different serial number.

The Pensacola Sextant Box (3547 and 173)

The National Museum of Naval Aviation has a sextant box with "dovetailed corners, the number 116 handwritten on the front, and the numbers 3547 and 173 handwritten on the bottom." The box contains "a sextant manufactured by W. Ludolph of Bremerhaven, Germany, in 1919, with the serial number XIX 1090, painted black."[2] The box was donated by W. A. Cluthe, a retired Pan Am captain, who said that he had borrowed the Ludolph sextant from Fred Noonan.[3] The box is listed in the table below as Brandis (theoretical) because the box contains modifications that may have been made to accommodate a Brandis bubble sextant.

Sextant Box Numbers: Suggestive Patterns

This chart is organized in the order of the Navy number given to the instruments by the Naval Observatory when they were sent there for calibration. Two entries are theoretical; the rest are actual pairs of numbers obtained from various sources. Two of the boxes in TIGHAR's possession have Naval Observatory numbers stamped on the box along with Brandis maker's numbers stenciled on the box.

In the engraving on the sextants, there is a symbol for the Naval Observatory between "U.S. Navy" and the number issued by the Naval Observatory. The symbol is an "N" superimposed on a square "O". The symbol is relatively clear in this photograph.

All the nautical instrument repair and calibration work was shipped off to Norfolk in the early 1950s.

"Important though this work was, the Observatory was open to the criticism, especially from astronomers, that navigational instruments should be no part of the work of an astronomical observatory. This was undoubtedly part of the reason that the chronometer function was transferred in 1951 to the Norfolk Navy Yard, leaving only a small group of instrument makers who repaired and constructed the Observatory’s telescopes and other instrumentation, rather than navigational instruments."[4]

Any sextant marked "FE Brandis" is definitely a pre-1925 or so product.

Click on the sort symbol next to or under the headings to sort on the values in that column.
Maker Maker No. Navy No. Inspection date Comments Bubble N.O. # on box
W&S (stamped into box and on plate) Warner & Swasey 69 34 Flying Fish Trading Co. ?
Brandis (theoretical) 3547 173 Pensacola ?
Brandis 2734 362 1943-04-18 ebay #350401896246; re-inspected 1965-11-12 no yes (die-punched)
K&E 18446 405 Smithsonian yes
K&E (in W&S box) 4940 415 1936-01-29 Flying Fish Trading Co. no
K&E 5418 575 1918-04-16 Mystic Seaport no
Brandis 3227 845 Mariner's Museum no
Buff & Buff 11778 1065 1918-05-12 eBay no
Buff & Buff 11949 1144 eBay no
Brandis 1146 1921-08-27 eBay no
Buff & Buff 13069 1248 ebay. n/a
Brandis 3339 1415 1942-12-26 Antique Helper No Yes
Brandis 3444 1461 eBay. no No, box is for a Buff & Buff
Brandis (theoretical) 3500 1542 Niku ? maybe
K&E 37548 1555 1919-10-24 Mariner's Museum no
Brandis (box only) 3483 1567 1932-01-27 ebay no
Brandis 3987 1584 1938-11-30 TIGHAR no yes
Brandis (sextant only) 3511 1585 TIGHAR (sextant only) no
Brandis (box only) large box 3527 1599 1933-05-04 TIGHAR (box only) yes
Brandis 4297 1880 1939-09-18 TIGHAR - McKenna no yes
Brandis 4672 1889 eBay (reported 11/17/2011 on AE Forum by D.P.Cotts) no no
Brandis 4345 1914 ebay. metal tag: 61071 000065. Inside edge: (pencil) serial 1914; Brandis stamp: 4001. no no
Brandis 4319 1960 ebay no (in box for 3483/1567)
Brandis (box is for 4234) 4279 2531 1941-07-23 Flying Fish Trading Co. no
Brandis 4994 2741 1942-05-25 eBay (reported 12/05/2011 on AE Forum by D.P.Cotts) no
Brandis 4946 2785 TIGHAR no
Brandis (no box) 4180 2859 eBay
Brandis 4180 2895 Bill Morris no
Brandis (box only) 5310[5] 2919 1946-03-07 eBay; Survey
Brandis 5620 2939 1919 Smithsonian no
Brandis 5292 2975 1919-03-26 Russ Dickey yes
Brandis 5296 2977 1919-03-16 Smithsonian yes
Brandis 5109 4067 eBay no
Brandis 5375 4125 ebay yes
Brandis 4487 4220 ebay no Box for 4037.
Brandis 4765 4267 1938-11-15 ebay no Appears to be 4765.
Brandis 4762 4334 eBay ?
Brandis 4144 4449 Bill Morris no
Brandis 3826 4603 eBay no Brass plaque on box: "248 US Navy 101009"
Brandis 4313 4665 Bruce Thomas no No box. In display case from USS Hancock.
Brandis 5760 4705 Smithsonian no
Brandis 3336 4773 eBay (no box) no
Brandis 3320 4799 eBay (reported 11/22/2011 on AE Forum by D.P.Cotts) no no
Mergenthaler 5083-44 1945-03-27 Only the box; ebay. n/a
Mergenthaler 5223-44 1945-01-04 MK. I. Mod. 0; ebay no Note on box for 5878-44
David White (1943) 11949 5508 eBay no
David White (1941) 5273 USNO Historical Committee Inv
Mergenthaler 5878-44 MK. I. Mod. 0; ebay no In box for 5223-44
David White (1941) 9746 eBay (reported 10/15/2011 on AE Forum by A.McKenna) was used on USS Hector no 13692 stamped on brass plate affixed above lid latches
David White (1943) 17649 17649-43 1946-07-19 eBay no
No Navy numbers or not known
Brandis 1844 ? eBay; plate on box containing 4762
Brandis 3193 none Smithsonian yes
Brandis 3702 none e-bay. Large "916" stenciled in gold on box. no "916"?
Brandis 4001 ? eBay; box for 4345 no
Brandis 4037 ? eBay; stencil on box for 4487
Brandis 4234 ? stencil on box
Brandis 5360 ? eBay; stencil on box for 3987

Looking for patterns in the data

There seems to be some correlation between the dates of calibration by the Naval Observatory and the number given to the sextant by the Observatory.

The numbers issued in 1919 seem to be in ascending order by date, but they are out of sequence compared to the rest of the table.

With the 1919 numbers removed, most of the rest of the numbers are in ascending order by date. Two of those sextants (2977 and 2975) are bubble mods for the Navy transatlantic flight in May of that year.

Ordered by N.O. number; anomalous rows marked in grey.
Maker Maker No. Navy No. Inspection date
K&E (in W&S box) 4940 415 1936-01-29
K&E 5418 575 1918-04-16
Buff & Buff 11778 1065 1918-05-12
K&E 37548 1555 1919-10-24
Brandis (box only) 3483 1567 1932-01-27
Brandis 3987 1584 1938-11-30
Brandis (box only) large box 3527 1599 1933-05-04
Brandis 4297 1880 1939-09-18
Brandis (box is for 4234) 4279 2531 1941-07-23
Brandis 5620 2939 1919
Brandis 5296 2977 1919-03-16
Brandis 5292 2975 1919-03-26
Brandis 4765 4267 1938-11-15
David White (1943) 17649 17649-43 1946-07-19

Discussion

Ric Gillespie
If we throw out the 1919 numbers as an anomaly, along with K&E #4940, we can say that the assignment of N.O. number 1542 (on the Niku box) might have occurred circa 1930/31 and that the instrument was still in the Navy inventory at that time. Noonan went to work for Pan Am in 1930. Pan Am acquired the landing rights to Honolulu, Midway, Wake and Guam in 1934 and began assembling its Pacific Division with Noonan as the lead navigator.
In other words, Noonan's acquisition of Brandis 3500/N.O. 1542 as surplus sometime between 1934 and 1936 seems possible.
Art Rypinski
Keep in mind that Brandis made thousands of sextants during the period 1918-1920 or so, which left the peacetime Navy with far more sextants than they could ever use. The Naval Observatory Annual Reports for the period describe surplusing of large number of instruments. According to the Smithsonian, Brandis was acquired by the Pioneer Instrument Co. in 1922, and "the manufacture of Brandis instruments ceased in 1932." I think it would be reasonable to believe that almost all of the Brandis sextants in circulation were actually manufactured in 1918-1920, and that none were manufactured after 1932. Further, the Naval Observatory appears to have changed its numbering plan (at least for aviation octants) in the late 1920s, and begin issuing NO numbers with the form XXXX-YY, where YY was the year of original calibration. Therefore, I believe that all of the post-1930 calibration dates are recalibrations of sextants that were originally calibrated and issued their NO numbers in 1918-1920. Hence, I hypothesize that neither the maker’s number nor the NO number of sextants calibrated after 1930 has any relationship with the calibration date.
  1. 3500/NO 1542 could have been surplused and put into private hands at any point after 1920. If 3500/1542 was a Byrd Sextant, however, I speculate that it would have been relatively rare and would have been kept in service until aviation octants became relatively plentiful--say, early 1930s?

Photo Gallery

Links

References

  1. "Update on Byrd Aircraft Sextant."
  2. Shoes p. 232.
  3. Ibid. p. 233.
  4. Sky and Ocean Joined: The U.S. Naval Observatory, 1830-2000, by Steven J. Dick, Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  5. The collimation label gives the Maker No. as 2919. 5310 is stamped in ink on the box while 2919 is impressed in the wood.

Related articles