Post-loss Radio Messages--Overview: Difference between revisions

From Ameliapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:Nauru_Radio_article2436500-4-001.jpg|200px|thumb|<div align="center">World press reported many post loss radio signals like that heard by Nauru Radio published in the 5 July 1937 Canberra Times. (Courtesy: Australian Newspapers Beta Service)</div>]]
[[Image:Nauru_Radio_article2436500-4-001.jpg|200px|thumb|<div align="center">World press reported many post loss radio signals like that heard by [[Nauru]] Radio published in the 5 July 1937 Canberra Times. (Courtesy: Australian Newspapers Beta Service)</div>]]
* [http://tighar.org/Projects/Earhart/timeline/1937events.html Post-loss Radio Messages--1937 Timeline]
* [http://tighar.org/Projects/Earhart/timeline/1937events.html Post-loss Radio Messages--1937 Timeline]
A complete exposition and analysis of all reported radio contacts with the lost aircraft is to be found in ''[[Finding Amelia]],'' by [[Ric Gillespie]]; the book contains a wealth of primary sources in a research library on a companion DVD.
A complete exposition and analysis of all reported radio contacts with the lost aircraft is to be found in ''[[Finding Amelia]],'' by [[Ric Gillespie]]; the book contains a wealth of primary sources in a research library on a companion DVD.

Revision as of 00:01, 2 August 2010

World press reported many post loss radio signals like that heard by Nauru Radio published in the 5 July 1937 Canberra Times. (Courtesy: Australian Newspapers Beta Service)

A complete exposition and analysis of all reported radio contacts with the lost aircraft is to be found in Finding Amelia, by Ric Gillespie; the book contains a wealth of primary sources in a research library on a companion DVD.

Technical considerations

Bearings taken after July 2 suggest that a transmitter was operating in the Phoenix Islands.

Battery Life

"Both batteries were rated at 85 ampere-hours. If both were at full charge on arrival at Niku -- a reasonable assumption -- there would have been enough charge for about 90 minutes of transmission time. The total transmission time required for all of the credible post-loss signals is 451 minutes."[1]

Names in the news

Los Angeles hoaxers

  • Walter McMenamy
  • Karl Pierson

"Two ham operators in Los Angeles - Walter McMenamy and Karl Pierson - were responsible for a great many of the first reports of post-loss signals but the pattern of what they said they heard is completely at odds with what was being heard in the search area and all the information they claimed to have gotten from Earhart could have been had by simply monitoring Coast Guard radio traffic. McMenamy and Pierson were almost certainly perpetrating a hoax - perhaps with the best of intentions (i.e. to encourage a large Navy search) or perhaps just to puff their own reputations as hot-shot radio experts, or some of both - who knows? The point is that the patterns of what they reported hearing - the times, the frequencies, the content - sticks out like a sore thumb when viewed in the context of the other reports."[2]

  • Howard Coons
  • Ernest Henderson
  • W. E. Tippin

References

  1. Brandenburg to EPAC, 1 April 2009. The careful reader will understand that the evaluation of post-loss messages continues and that, therefore, the total number of minutes to be accounted will vary with the estimate of credibility as the study continues.
  2. Gillespie, Forum, 1 Nov 2004.

Related material

References