NR16020 antennas: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{draft}} | {{draft}} | ||
The design and function of the [[trailing antenna]] and [[loop antenna]] are discussed separately. This article is concerned primarily with the other antennas used on the [[Electra]]. | |||
[[Ric Gillespie]], [http://www.tighar.org/TTracks/2000Vol_16/1603.pdf "Propagation Analysis," November, 2000, ''TIGHAR Tracks.''] | [[Ric Gillespie]], [http://www.tighar.org/TTracks/2000Vol_16/1603.pdf "Propagation Analysis," November, 2000, ''TIGHAR Tracks.''] | ||
| Line 23: | Line 26: | ||
* [[Radio equipment on NR16020]]. | * [[Radio equipment on NR16020]]. | ||
* [[Removal of trailing antenna]]. | * [[Removal of trailing antenna]]. | ||
<!-- Please leave this category marker at the bottom. You may add this article to other categories if you wish --> | |||
[[Category:Radio considerations]] | |||
Revision as of 00:55, 24 February 2009
The design and function of the trailing antenna and loop antenna are discussed separately. This article is concerned primarily with the other antennas used on the Electra.
Ric Gillespie, "Propagation Analysis," November, 2000, TIGHAR Tracks.
The other part of the equation seems to be the changes that were made to Earhart’s transmitting antenna prior to her second World Flight attempt. Originally, Western Electric had set up the vee antenna that ran from a mast on top of the fuselage to each vertical fin on the tail to be an appropriate length for Earhart’s two primary communications frequencies, 3105 and 6210 Kcs. The much lower 500 Kcs frequency required a much longer antenna which was provided by a “trailing wire” that was played out into the slipstream after the aircraft was in flight and reeled back in before landing. The wreck in Hawaii that ended the first World Flight attempt also wiped out the mast on the belly from which the trailing wire was deployed. During repairs back in California the decision was made to eliminate the trailing wire and lengthen the vee antenna on top of the fuselage to accommodate all three frequencies on the one antenna. The mast that supported the point of the vee was moved forward several feet. It was a terrible compromise that provided no meaningful capability to transmit on 500 Kcs while greatly complicating the problem of putting out a decent signal on 3105 and 6210. There appears to have been, however, another consequence to lengthening the vee. The new length made an excellent antenna for the unintended harmonic frequencies.
Ric Gillespie, 26 April 2000 Forum.
- Earhart's transmitting antenna was the dorsal "vee" and was, in fact, somewhat directional.
Bob Brandenburg, 27 April 2000 Forum.
- At radiation angles below about 30 degrees above horizontal, the azimuthal pattern of AE's antenna was shaped rather like a figure eight with a large waist and fat lobes. The pattern was symmetrical with respect to the axis of the beam pattern, and each of the two lobes was about 80 degrees wide. The axis of the pattern was oriented about 30 degrees to starboard of the the aircraft's longitudinal axis - - an apparent consequence of the location of the antenna feedpoint - - but the width of the pattern lobes was such that there was no significant loss of signal strength in the fore and aft directions relative to aircraft heading. As the radiation angle increased above 30 degrees, the pattern became closer to circular, and above about 45 degrees was omnidirectional. It's worth noting that AE's antenna was shorter than a half wavelength at both of her frequencies, which accounts for its broad radiation pattern.
- When AE turned southeast on the LOP, Howland and the Itasca were very close to the peak of the aft lobe for low angles, but that factor didn't come into play. When AE was 100 miles from Howland, the vertical radiation angle was 70 degrees. At 150 miles, the angle was 45 degrees, and the radiation pattern was still omnidirectional. At 200 miles, the radiation angle was down to 30 degrees, but by then AE's signal strength at Howland and the Itasca had dropped well below the threshold for detection.
Ric Gillespie, 24 October 2000 Forum.
- The antenna feed point was changed. Prior to the Luke Field wreck the dorsal vee fed into the fuselage at a point on the top of the fuselage just above and forward of the starboard side cabin window. The wire then ran down the interior cabin wall to the transmitter. When the airplane came out of the repair shop in Burbank in May the feed point had been altered so that the wire came down from the antenna and fed into the fuselage way down on the starboard side of the airplane just opposite where the transmitter was installed on the cabin floor.
- There are lots and lots of good photos of the airplane after it left Miami and the insulators on the dorsal vee are easy to see. There are two insulators right up close to the forward mast and others right up close to the attach points on the vertical fins. There are no insulators elsewhere on the wire.