I dont believe that it slowly slide down the reef face strewing parts as it went.
Neither do I as stated in the ROV thread. I suggested it was ground up on reef and, the remains scattered down the reef slope.
Everything that had a right angle or a concentric circle someone would try to identify it as a particular aircraft part.
No, not
everything just possibly the bits we have been looking into. There are some lovely spectacular bits of coral down there for sure but, not being a diver or expert on coral I'll leave that to the 'experts'.
If it had been a ditch or crash and sink I would expect to see larger bits of wreckage for sure but, that's not the hypothesis in this case. A reef landing is great but, the sand on the beaches used to be solid stone and rock and one time, that's the power of the sea, take a look at the wreck of the SS norwich City. That was built like a brick outhouse, now look at it. The sea and the reef would make short work of airframes (if that's what it is)
Also you must consider the fact that we don't have much to go on in the ROV footage, 3 mins? so, we're trying to make the most of what there is.
Scale, resolution, focus etc are all an issue but, you can only work with what you have. As I pointed out with the Nessie photo, if the original image capture device (camera) didn't capture the detail then, no amount of enhancing will add detail that isn't there.
Only time will tell and, hopefully this fall there will be a definitive yes or no, aircraft remains or no aircraft remains. But one thing is
certain, it's a coral reef and, it has coral, but, what else?
All of the above IMHO, not written in stone and, time will tell

Shouldn't this debate be in the ROV footage thread, I'm sure there were similar ones there ?