Brian Ainslie....wandered here courtesy of Google's artwork for the anniversary. I've spent the past several days (at work!) alternating between reading and skimming that VAST amount of info on the site.
About me: 35, husband and father. Degree in History. I do think Oswald shot Kennedy by himself.
A few random thoughts:
1. The evidence does seem to support, when taken in total, that both the plane and AE were on the island (Niko).
2. It is clear that no single item "proves" the theory. However, the case would certainly pass a civil trial level of critique (preponderance of evidence). But beyond a reasonable doubt? Perhaps....reasonable minds can see all sides of this intriguing theory.
3. I have read several posts about the castaways, the plane landing site, and the survivors of the NC and I think there is a gap there. Andrew McKenna seems to think in the same manner as I do (by that I mean I follow his logic and find myself nodding at it the most). Dead or alive by the time of the Navy flight several days later (the
Colorado plane), I can't imagine that, at minimum, there would have been some obvious, visible marker. If they had the means to stay alive long enough to send the radio signals and find/bring/travel the various items that have been found to the island,
surely they would have devised some simple method of notifying airborne searchers of their existence. I apologize if there is already a chain somewhere about this. As others have recently mentioned, it is nearly impossible to sort through all this stuff, especially when such a topic covers so many potential threads.
4. In the threads I have read, tolerance for other's opinions seems to be hit or miss. The overall tone of the research, however, seems fairly balanced to this "neutral" party.
5. Keep up the good work! This is a fascinating subject and has given me goose bumps at times!
