Advanced search  
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
 1 
 on: Today at 10:41:08 AM 
Started by Ric Gillespie - Last post by Renaud Dudon
My apologies for the misspelliing. I should know better.

Don W

Don't worry, I get my names mixed up all the time... :D

 2 
 on: Today at 08:56:55 AM 
Started by Ric Gillespie - Last post by Don White
My apologies for the misspelliing. I should know better.

Don W

 3 
 on: May 12, 2024, 08:49:14 AM 
Started by Ric Gillespie - Last post by Renaud Dudon
Just a few additional comments:

- The Lorraine W12 e2b does use castor oil ('huile de ricin') for lubrication (page 50 of the 'Centre d'Instruction des Spécialistes de l'Aviation' guide). The warm pressure required for a new engine is 2.5 Kg/cm3, and the operating temperature is between 60 and 70°C.

- Water circuit: The same manual has some interesting information. Demineralized water is used, preferably boiled water... Even if it doesn't appear to be a standard measure, it is advisable to add 25 to 40% neutral glycerine to the water to prevent it freezing when the engine is not running.

- The 'Centre d'instruction de l'Armée de l'Air' also refers to a possible water fillable container at the top of the cylinders (page 36): “No high points in the piping installation without possible release of water and steam (on the ground, when climbing, or in horizontal flight). The radiator (or feeder) must be loaded on top of the cylinders, both in climb and horizontal flight.” The reason for this setup seems to be the possibility of water vapors escaping at the top of the water circuit. The manual also states that the radiator/feeder cap might be drilled for this purpose. In fact, it was specified to empty two liters of water to leave room for expansion and escape of water vapour at the top of the circuit (page 50). 

In spite of several innovative features, the 12E engines family, designed in 1923, was somewhat outdated even for 1927. The power output with their operating pressure, temperature and RPM; was limited without overfeeding, unlike Hispano-Suiza (V12 700 HP attained in 1930). IMO, this is one possible explanation for the continued use of castor oil instead of mineral oil.

BTW Yes, Levassor (not Levasseur) ;), Before his sudden death in 1897, was an famous early automobiles designer, a time associated with Panhard, then Daimler and even Peugeot.

LTM

 4 
 on: May 08, 2024, 06:54:39 PM 
Started by Ric Gillespie - Last post by Don White
Castor oil was commonly used in engine lubricants, both for aircraft and automobiles. Hence the brand name 'Castrol.'

Due to the total-loss oiling systems used in rotary aircraft engines in WWI being lubricated with castor oil, pilots of said aircraft who were inhaling fumes all the time they were flying had chronic diarrhea from its laxative effects.

Lorraine Dietrich is one of the great names of early automobiling -- as is Panhard et Levasseur.

Don W

 5 
 on: May 08, 2024, 03:35:07 PM 
Started by Ric Gillespie - Last post by Matt Revington
Did aircraft in that period really use Castor oil as a lubricant. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44643970


, it looks like castor oil would be distinct from petroleum based oils, based on fatty acid content, but I have no idea if it would last in the environment as long.  If it did, it’s preferential use by European aircraft before 1930 might have some diagnostic value

 6 
 on: May 08, 2024, 03:27:47 PM 
Started by Ric Gillespie - Last post by Ric Gillespie
Trace oils in pond sediments can sometimes be detected after  40 years or more according to some journals.  Have sediment samples from around the location where these items been found in the pond been tested for oils/fuel or other chemical contamination that might be related to a plane crash? Sorry if I am suggesting something that was already done

In 2022/23 we tried our damndest to get sediment core samples from the pond for testing.  A paleoecologist at Memorial University in St. John's said that core sample would give us an almost year-by-year compositional history of the sediment.  We had it all set up, but the day we flew the two grad students to the pond to take the core samples, the wind was blowing harder than forecast and the inflatable boat we brought was useless.  Then we came up with a plan to do it in the winter through a hole drilled in the ice. No boat. No wind problem.  We were all set to go when the university faculty went on strike.  By the time that got sorted out, the ice had melted and the paleoecologist bailed because she didn't like all the media attention the project was getting.
In the end, finding unexplained hydrocarbons in 100 year-old sediment wouldn't prove anything and not finding them wouldn't disqualify the hypothesis.  The work we're now doing with the artifacts is proving much more productive.

 7 
 on: May 08, 2024, 03:01:13 PM 
Started by Ric Gillespie - Last post by Matt Revington
Trace oils in pond sediments can sometimes be detected after  40 years or more according to some journals.  Have sediment samples from around the location where these items been found in the pond been tested for oils/fuel or other chemical contamination that might be related to a plane crash? Sorry if I am suggesting something that was already done.

Did aircraft in that period really use Castor oil as a lubricant. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44643970

 8 
 on: May 08, 2024, 10:18:02 AM 
Started by Ric Gillespie - Last post by Ric Gillespie
Thanks for your patience. The metallurgist has confirmed my suspicions.  The steel is plated.
That is why the lab results differ from the XRF results.
We were interested in identifying the steel alloy the semi-cyindrical artifact is made of.  We have multiple XRF readings but we wondered if they might be "polluted" by contaminants on the surface of the artifact, so Rick Freeman took a small piece that had broken off the artifact and ground it down until he could see bare, shiny metal. In so doing, he inadvertently ground off the plating, so what the lab analyzed was the base steel minus the plating. What the XRF was seeing is the base metal, plus the plating, plus a layer of paint.

The base metal is carbon steel allied with a little manganese.
Based on averages of the XRF readings, the plating is:
Tin  4.587%
Zinc  1.407%
Manganese 0.458% (minus the manganese in the steel alloy)
Copper 0.394%
Cobalt 0.736%
Chromium  0.129%
Molybdenum 0.125%
Vanadium   0.125%

The paint is:
Silicon   2.633%
Titanium   1.398%
Lead 0.129%
and maybe some of the Cobalt.

"Tin cans" are steel plated with tin as a corrosion inhibitor. They've been around since 1840. The tin plating on this artifact is much more complex than a can of peaches, but its purpose is the same.  The paint added a further layer of protection.  Whether or not it is part of the PL8's water tank, somebody really didn't want this thing to get rusty.
Nevertheless, the portion of this object that was exposed to the pond water corroded completely away over the decades. 
What does that say about the survivability of other un-buried and mostly un-plated steel debris?  No wonder our visual searches have found nothing.



 9 
 on: May 07, 2024, 01:49:27 PM 
Started by Ric Gillespie - Last post by Renaud Dudon
ho Ric, I'd be upset if you had problems with your payroll controller. :) So I will wait.

BTW i will receive soon a good and lengthy Monography regarding Lorraine Dietrich. You know that this manufacturer first designed sportcars ? Did it ever occur to you that this water tank might have been derived from car apparatus?

Night is coming in Dordogne and i have my little son to care of. I have to tell him the story of a strange big seabird that vanished across the Atlantic some 100 years ago. Take care, I will keep in touch.

 10 
 on: May 07, 2024, 01:08:54 PM 
Started by Ric Gillespie - Last post by Ric Gillespie
As we say in French: 'je donne ma langue au chat'. :)

LOL! Sorry.  As we say in English, this is way above my pay-grade and I'm trying not to embarrass myself more than usual.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
Copyright 2024 by TIGHAR, a non-profit foundation. No portion of the TIGHAR Website may be reproduced by xerographic, photographic, digital or any other means for any purpose. No portion of the TIGHAR Website may be stored in a retrieval system, copied, transmitted or transferred in any form or by any means, whether electronic, mechanical, digital, photographic, magnetic or otherwise, for any purpose without the express, written permission of TIGHAR. All rights reserved.

Contact us at: info@tighar.org • Phone: 610-467-1937 • Membership formwebmaster@tighar.org

Powered by MySQL SMF 2.0.18 | SMF © 2021, Simple Machines Powered by PHP