Other readers who follow your links may see something different than I do. To me they do not state what you believe happened to AE and FN. The links are, at best, what you think didn't happen. In fact they aren't even that clear. Your website article "debunking TIGHAR", Then an article that says you don't believe in the Japanese capture theory, A Life magazine story on TIGHAR, and a link to a 2002 thread that I can't even find your name in, that talks about the Norwich city disaster, castaway eating habits, Ric's run in with the guano lagoon, history of boots, and so on.
This is your response to the question "what is Gary's position on what happened to AE and FN?". You very carefully didn't say in your 4.27am post that this was your position but simply posted some links. Where is the detailed statement we have come to expect from you? Even Marty imagines a final version with calculations in it.
I'm disappointed Gary as you aren't replying to the question with your usual clarity or details.