Mr. H.A.C.VA says:
"The belly antenna , lost or not , had nothing to do with either reception , or transmission of radio communication signals ."
If the belly antenna had nothing to do with reception or transmission of radio communication signals, what was it there for, hanging laundry?
If you are going to make pronouncements like the above, then please elaborate on what you think the antenna's intended use so the rest of us can attempt to understand your rationale.
Perhaps you mean you mean the belly antenna was not used for voice, morse code, or DF signals, but that is not what you wrote. The result is confusion on what you are trying to say, and frustration trying to follow your logic, which only serves to undermine your arguments.
A. McKenna