Joe, that seems to be a problem in communicated details to the reader. In one of your reports it does indeed show a picture of a partially filled campana bottle, with label. While you never state that particular bottle was the "known bottle tested", it gave the impression to me and probably others.
If I understand you correctly today, you are stating the empty(with traces), non labeled bottle was sent to the lab to be tested against the broken artifact found. Correct?
That empty, non labeled bottle does not have the same curves of an orginal campana bottle, nor can it be said positively 100% is a known campana bottle. That is a very important point, and is alarming in that there is no known base sample being tested.
Therefore you have been arguing and testing an unknown bottle sample against an unknown artifact sample?
Until you have a known campana sample to test, I really do not see the point in trying to prove the artifact is campana balm.