Ric and Jeff ,
I have a few concerns regarding some of the variables already mentioned ( tire compression for one),but what other factors may influence the outcome of the test? In regard to the Smithsonian version of the vega, it was mentioned that the exterior was removed and recovered and repainted,...were the markings re positioned exactly in the original positions? Concerning the two different Vegas owned by Earhart , did they set at differing resting heights? I believe it was stated that Earhart's vega was nearly worn out when she sold it,.....would the resting height of the worn Vega differ from the height of the restored Smithsonian version ,due to strut fatigue, along with fuel/ cargo loading or lack thereof? Most important, how will identical fuselage angle be replicated?, ...In the photo of the fender-pan version Vega, the tail drag rests on a wheeled platform,...the Smithsonian version tail drag,is also supported,.... are these platforms equal in height so as to align the fuselage to the same angle? The fender-less version vega photo,( drag stick not in view)....is that drag stick ,worn, new, bent????Is it resting on a transport dollie ? ,..I believe mathematically a minor difference back there translates to an increase/decrease in nose height up front. These things have been on my mind for sometime, I look forward to your response,in case others may be wondering these same things.