As a professional and by your TIGHAR # with an R it is incumbent upon you to be accurate in your descriptions of these items. In my humble opinion you are very premature in identifying that "skeleton" as that of Fred Noonan without the benefit of a DNA Match.
Bob, "There you go again..."
As the TIGHAR diagram below shows, "Researcher" is a level of membership.
I am not a professional researcher.
I am not a professional academic.
I am not a professional detective.
And I do not represent TIGHAR, as Ric has explained.
I am a professional pilot (ATP).
I am a professional computer programmer.
I am a professional farmer.
I don't see that a DNA test is in order here: this is not a homicide case. People are mainly interested (in my opinion) where Amelia Earhart ended her journey; the "preponderance of the evidence" is sufficient standard, while "beyond a reasonable doubt" might be a stretch. The sooner we can answer this question, the better, because (again, in my opinion) there are too many other important problems to solve in this world. Wasting alot more time, effort, and treasure on absolute certainty in the Earhart quest (let alone on expeditions that produce no results) is neither particularly prudent nor honorable.