 |
Figure 4. |
Galten brought the log current by stating that the events on the next line
spanned 0844 to 0846. With the chronology of his log restored, Galten continued
to record events as they occurred. Fig. 4 shows the completed page
of the radio log. No other times are changed and the log shows an orderly
progression of events.
At some later time – just when is uncertain - a further change was
made to the Position #2 log. The log shows that yet another message
was received from Earhart. Someone, perhaps Galten, perhaps someone else,
tried to cram it onto the same line with the 0843 message. Figure 5
is a detail of that part of the log.
 |
Figure
5. |
The new entry was “(?/KHAQQ XMISION WE ARE RUNNING ON LINE N ES S” which
translates as “Questionable KHAQQ transmission, We are running on line
north and south.” There wasn’t enough room to get it all
on the one line. The first problem was was the need to X-out the 43. Then
there wasn’t enough room for the N ES S so that had to go on the line
above. To re-enter the 43 the typist had to move the platen down a
half space and stick it between the lines.
As shown in Fig. 6, when the Position #2 log was “smoothed” all
the X-outs disappeared. Having two events occur at 0843 was a problem so
the wandering 43 vanished altogether. Now the log showed an orderly
chronology that lumped the two transmissions together as one message that
began at 0844.
Figure 6.
The question is, when was the “We are running on line north
and south” transmission
really heard? It was obviously added after the rest of the page had been
typed. Otherwise the message could have just been logged in sequence
and there would be no need to cram it on the 0843 line. And it’s not
just a later elaboration on the 0843 entry, otherwise there would be no need
to write KHAQQ XMISION. As with the 0843 message, Galten apparently
didn’t hear the transmission himself and only learned about it second-hand
when it was too late to log it in its proper sequence.
Given that the alterations to Galten’s log strongly suggest that “We
are running on line north and south” was heard after 0843, we must
ask if there is any evidence as to when it may have been heard. Yes,
there is. Commander Thompson, Associated Press correspondent James
Carey, and United Press correspondent Howard Hanzlick all claimed that the
last message from Earhart was heard at 8:55.
Neither Carey nor Hanzlick heard the message first-hand. They had
both been ashore with the welcoming party and were en route back to the ship
until 9:10 , according to the ship’s deck log. Carey’s
notebook entry, written sometime later that evening, says, “Aboard
ship got news that at 8:55 am (last heard) Earhart was believed to have given
a sun line position; however, this without a reference point – presumed
to be Howland.” He also jotted notes on the back of an unsent “flash” radio
message announcing Earhart’s arrival that he had left with the radio
operators. Exactly when he made the notations is not known but it had
to have been after he was back aboard ship. The notes say:
8:55 – last on
Ran out gas about 8:20
9:00 – still on air –
Hanzlick’s notes are reportedly a bit different:
0844 “AE radioed her line of position as 157-337.”
0855 “We are running north and south.”
Commander Thompson’s version of events changed over time. At
10:15 a.m. he sent a message to Coast Guard San Francisco Division saying:
“Earhart contact 0742 reported one half hour fuel and no landfall position
doubtful contact 0646 reported approximately one hundred miles from Itasca but
no relative bearing. 0843 reported line of position 157 dash 337 but no reference
point presume Howland.”
Note that there is no mention of “running on line north and
south.”
At 2:02 p.m. Thompson sent another message to his superiors in San Francisco
saying that, “We have had no positions, speed, or courses from Earhart’s
plane except so called line of position at 0843 which had no reference point.”
Again, the time is 0843 and there is nothing about running north and south.
But then, at 7:40 p.m. that evening, in another message to San Francisco,
Thompson said:
“Itasca contacted Earhart to receive incomplete
message on agreed schedules from 0248 to 0855 this morning …
Have heard no signals from Earhart since 0855 this morning when she gave
Itasca a line of position believed to mean radio bearing and stated she
was running north and south.”
The time of the final message had changed to 8:55 and for the first time
came the news that she had said she was running north and south.
At 2:05 p.m. the following afternoon, July 3rd, Thompson sent a nearly identical
message to Fleet Airbase, Pearl Harbor.
“Received incomplete messages on agreed schedules from 0248 to 0855 two July…
At 0855 she gave Itasca a line of position 157 337
believed to be radio bearing and stated she was running north and south.”
By 5:20 p.m. that same afternoon, the time of the last message was back
to 08:43. In a message to Secretary of the Treasury, Henry Morgenthau,
Thompson wrote:
“No information Earhart plane since 0843 2 July …”
The next evening, at 7:00 p.m. on July 4, Thompson sent a long and highly
inaccurate report listing the times and “exact text” of the messages
that had been received from Earhart – and time of the final transmission
changed yet again. Now he said
“0844 Earhart called Itasca ‘We are on the line
of position 157 dash 337 will repeat this message on 6210 kilocycles we are now
running north and south.’”
To summarize, in official messages sent by Itasca’s commanding
officer, the time of Earhart’s last in-flight radio transmission changed
three times in the space of two days; from 0843, to 0855, back to 0843, and
finally to 0844. What could account for such discrepancies? The
available historical documents suggest a reasonable sequence of events. |