Earhart Project header
Research Document #12
The Bones Chronology, Cont.
This document is provided on this web site as a matter of general interest and to aid in research by individuals. No permission to reproduce it or transmit it is implied or granted.

Because of the length of this document (23 pages in printed form) it is split into segments so it will load more quickly. This is page four of five pages. When you get to the end of this page, click on NEXT to go to the next page, or on the page number you desire.

A simple timeline of the bones chronology can be seen by clicking on Bones Chronology Timeline.

31. March 31, 1941
Note in file 4439-40 (19)
from Macdonald to Macpherson
Transcript:

The Central Medical Authority

We have spoken by telephone concerning this matter & I am sending you the file & the coffin to the Central Medical School to Dr. Hoodless.

2. H.E. will be glad if the bones may be examined & and a report submitted in due course.

P.D. Macdonald
Asst. Secy. W. P.H.C.


31a. March 31, 1941
Note in file 4439-40 (20)
from Director Central Medical School (presumed) to Hoodless
Transcript:

Principal C.M.S.

The entries in this file will put us in possession of the known facts of certain curios and remains which will be sent to you, probably action 1/4 [April 1], for general inspection and later report.


32. April 4, 1941
Report, Hoodless to Sir Harry

Report on portion of a human skeleton.

I have today examined a collection of bones forming part of a human skeleton. These bones were delivered to me in a closed wooden box by Mr. P. D. Macdonald of the Western Pacific High Commission.

2. The bones included:- (1) a skull with the right zygoma and malar bones broken off: (2) mandible with only four teeth in position; (3) part of the right scapula; (4) the first thoracic vertebra; 5) portion of a rib (? 2nd right rib); (6) left humerus; 7) right radius; (8) right innominate bone; (9) right femur; (10) left femur; (11) right tibia; (12) right fibula; and (13) the right scaphoid bone of the foot.

3. From this list it is seen that less than half of the total skeleton is available for examination.

4. All these bones are very weather-beaten and have been exposed to the open air for a considerable time. Except in one or two small areas all traces of muscular attachments and the various ridges and prominences have been obliterated.

5. By taking measurements of the length of the femur, tibia and the humerus I estimate that these bongs belonged to a skeleton of total height of 5 feet 51/2 inches approximately.

6. From the half sub-pubic angle of the right innominate bone, the "set" of the two femora, and the ratio of the circumferences of the long bones to their individual lengths it may be definitely stated that the skeleton is that of a MALE.

7. Owing to the weather-beaten condition of all the bones it is impossible to be dogmatic in regard to the age of the person at the time of death, but I am of the opinion that he was not less than 45 years of age and that probably he was older: say between 45 and 55 years.

8. I am not prepared to give an opinion on the race or nationality of this skeleton, except to state that it is probably not that of a pure South Sea Islander-Micronesian or Polynesian. It could be that of a short, stocky, muscular European, or even a half-caste, or person of mixed European descent.

9. If further details are necessary I am prepared to take detailed and exact measurements of the principal bones in this collection, and to work out the various indices ( e.g. the platymeric index for the femur or the cnemic index for the tibia ) but if such a detailed report is required the obvious course to adopt would be to submit these bones to the Anthropological Dept of the Sydney University where Professor Elkin would be only too pleased to make a further report.

D.W. Hoodless

Principal,
Central Medical School
Suva.

4th April, 1941.


33. April 5, 1941
Note to file 44439-40 (21)
from Hoodless to “D.M.S.” (Director Medical School?)
Transcript:

D.M.S.

My report on these bones is enclosed. I will take charge of these bones until it is decided what to do with them.

D.W. Hoodless


34. April 7, 1941
Note to file 4439-40 (22)
D.M.S. to Asst. Secy (Macdonald)
Transcript:

[indecipherable word] report from Dr. Hoodless is enclosed at 11 [refers to Hoodless report]. Do you wish to take the further action he mentions?

35. April 11, 1941
Typed note in file 4439-40 (23)
from Vaskess to Sir Harry
Transcript:

His Excellency,

Submitted with 10 [Gallagher's letter of December 27th] and 11 [Hoodless report] and minutes 20 and 22 above [notes to file of March 31 and April 5]. The report 11 appears definitely to indicate that the skeleton cannot be that of the late Amelia Earhart, but Y. E. [Your Excellency] may wish action taken as suggested in paragraph 9 of 11 although it does not seem possible that any useful purpose will be served by proceeding farther.

2. The sextant box with its contents is now with me. Perhaps Captain Nasmyth might be willing to examine this with a view to ascertaining the origin?


36. April 12, 1941
Note in red ink to file 4439-40 (24)
Sir Harry to Vaskess
Transcript:

Sec

Pl ask CMA [Macpherson] to convey my thanks to Dr. Hoodlesss for the trouble he has taken in this matter & and to request him to retain the remains until further notice.

2. Pl ask Captain Nasmyth orally if he can throw any light on the origin of the sextant.

3. Then to one again.


36a. April 12, 1941
Typed note to file 4439-40 (25)
Vaskess to Macpherson
Transcript:

The Central Medical Authority,

With His Excellency's minute 24 above (preceding note) (paragraph 1). Would you be so good as to take the action accordingly?

2. I should be grateful if the file could be returned for further action.

Secretary W.P.H.C.


37. April 16, 1941
Note to file 4439-40 (26)
Macpherson to Hoodless
Transcript:

Principal CMS

Please see para 1 of 24

D.C.M. Macpherson
for CMA


38. April 17, 1941
Note to file 4439-40 (27)
Hoodless to Macpherson
Transcript:

C.M.A.

Noted - thank you.

DW Hoodless

Comment:
This acknowledgment by Hoodless of Sir Harry’s request that he “retain the remains until further notice” is the last we hear of action involving the bones.


39. April 18, 1941
Note to file 4439-40 (28)
Macpherson to Vaskess
Transcript:

Secy W.P.H.C.,

Returned to you. I have read Dr. Hoodless' report with interest and agree with his conclusions.

D.C.M. Macpherson
ACMA, Fiji


40. April 28, 1941
Note to file 4439-40 (29)
Transcript:

Telegram to Ag. A.O. Gardner Island No. 2 dated 28/4/41

40a. April 28, 1941
Telegram No. 2 - circled 12
from Vaskess to Gallagher
Transcript:

Confidential. Your letter of 27th December remains and sextant box received but not the sextant. Did you forward sextant?

Secretary, W.P.H.C.


40b. April 28, 1941
Telegram (not numbered) – circled 13
Gallagher to Vaskess

NOTE: The version of this telegram in the “Tarawa File” (Gallagher’s copies) differs slightly from the version in the W.P.H.C. file. The copy of the telegram in Gallagher's file is the only telegram in the file that is not on a standard government telegram form but is, instead, simply typed on a piece of paper. It is also the only document in that file with initials and numbers written at the bottom. They are appear to be “PAL 9/2.” Gallagher’s copy is addressed from “The Officer-in-Charge, P.I.S.S., Gardner Island” to “The Secretary, Western Pacific High Commission, Suva.” The W.P.H.C. copy is addressed from “Acting Administrative Officer, Gardner Island” (an incorrect title) to “Secretary, Western Pacific High Commission”

The transcript of Gallagher’s copy is:

Confidential. Your telegram No. 2, no sextant was found. Only part discovered was thrown away by finder but was probably part of an inverting eyepiece.

Gallagher.

The transcript of the W.P.H.C. copy says:

Confidential. Your telegram No. 2, no sextant was found. Only part discovered was thrown away by finder but was probably part of thread of inverted eyepiece.

Gallagher. [handwritten note from Vaskess] (but see 1)

Comment:
Vaskess is referring to RC’s original telegram of October 1, 1940 which erroneously says that a sextant was found.

Question:
Which version is correct?

NEXT 1 2 3 4 5 BACK
Bones Chronology Timeline

Archived Documents Earhart Project Home Page

The Earhart Project To Save A Devastator Welsh Lightning Project Midnight Ghost Historic Preservation Contract Services TIGHAR Speakers TIGHAR Theatre
Ameliapedia TIGHAR News TIGHAR Tracks TIGHAR Store About TIGHAR JOIN Site Map TIGHAR Home