| 31. March 31, 1941
Note in file 4439-40 (19)
from Macdonald to Macpherson
Transcript:
| The Central Medical Authority
We have spoken by telephone
concerning this matter & I am sending you the file & the coffin to the
Central Medical School to Dr. Hoodless.
2. H.E. will be glad if the
bones may be examined & and a report submitted in due course.
P.D. Macdonald
Asst. Secy. W. P.H.C.
|
31a.
March 31, 1941
Note in file 4439-40 (20)
from Director Central Medical School (presumed) to Hoodless Transcript:
| Principal C.M.S.
The entries in this file will
put us in possession of the known facts of certain curios and remains
which will be sent to you, probably action 1/4 [April 1], for
general inspection and later report.
|
32.
April 4, 1941
Report, Hoodless to Sir Harry
| Report on portion of a human
skeleton.
I have today examined a collection
of bones forming part of a human skeleton. These bones were delivered
to me in a closed wooden box by Mr. P. D. Macdonald of the Western Pacific
High Commission.
2. The bones included:- (1)
a skull with the right zygoma and malar bones broken off: (2) mandible
with only four teeth in position; (3) part of the right scapula; (4)
the first thoracic vertebra; 5) portion of a rib (? 2nd right rib);
(6) left humerus; 7) right radius; (8) right innominate bone; (9) right
femur; (10) left femur; (11) right tibia; (12) right fibula; and (13)
the right scaphoid bone of the foot.
3. From this list it is seen
that less than half of the total skeleton is available for examination.
4. All these bones are very
weather-beaten and have been exposed to the open air for a considerable
time. Except in one or two small areas all traces of muscular attachments
and the various ridges and prominences have been obliterated.
5. By taking measurements
of the length of the femur, tibia and the humerus I estimate that these
bongs belonged to a skeleton of total height of 5 feet 51/2 inches approximately.
6. From the half sub-pubic
angle of the right innominate bone, the "set" of the two femora, and
the ratio of the circumferences of the long bones to their individual
lengths it may be definitely stated that the skeleton is that of a MALE.
7. Owing to the weather-beaten
condition of all the bones it is impossible to be dogmatic in regard
to the age of the person at the time of death, but I am of the opinion
that he was not less than 45 years of age and that probably he was older:
say between 45 and 55 years.
8. I am not prepared to give
an opinion on the race or nationality of this skeleton, except to state
that it is probably not that of a pure South Sea Islander-Micronesian
or Polynesian. It could be that of a short, stocky, muscular European,
or even a half-caste, or person of mixed European descent.
9. If further details are
necessary I am prepared to take detailed and exact measurements of the
principal bones in this collection, and to work out the various indices
( e.g. the platymeric index for the femur or the cnemic index for the
tibia ) but if such a detailed report is required the obvious course
to adopt would be to submit these bones to the Anthropological Dept
of the Sydney University where Professor Elkin would be only too pleased
to make a further report.
D.W. Hoodless
Principal,
Central Medical School
Suva.
4th April, 1941.
|
33.
April 5, 1941
Note to file 44439-40 (21)
from Hoodless to “D.M.S.” (Director Medical School?) Transcript:
| D.M.S.
My report on these bones is
enclosed. I will take charge of these bones until it is decided what
to do with them.
D.W. Hoodless
|
34.
April 7, 1941
Note to file 4439-40 (22)
D.M.S. to Asst. Secy (Macdonald)
Transcript:
| [indecipherable word]
report from Dr. Hoodless is enclosed at 11 [refers to Hoodless report].
Do you wish to take the further action he mentions? |
35.
April 11, 1941
Typed note in file 4439-40 (23)
from Vaskess to Sir Harry
Transcript:
| His Excellency,
Submitted with 10 [Gallagher's
letter of December 27th] and 11 [Hoodless report] and minutes
20 and 22 above [notes to file of March 31 and April 5]. The
report 11 appears definitely to indicate that the skeleton cannot be
that of the late Amelia Earhart, but Y. E. [Your Excellency]
may wish action taken as suggested in paragraph 9 of 11 although it
does not seem possible that any useful purpose will be served by proceeding
farther.
2. The sextant box with its
contents is now with me. Perhaps Captain Nasmyth might be willing to
examine this with a view to ascertaining the origin?
|
36.
April 12, 1941
Note in red ink to file 4439-40 (24)
Sir Harry to Vaskess
Transcript:
| Sec
Pl ask CMA [Macpherson]
to convey my thanks to Dr. Hoodlesss for the trouble he has taken in
this matter & and to request him to retain the remains until further
notice.
2. Pl ask Captain Nasmyth
orally if he can throw any light on the origin of the sextant.
3. Then to one again.
|
36a.
April 12, 1941
Typed note to file 4439-40 (25)
Vaskess to Macpherson
Transcript:
| The Central Medical Authority,
With His Excellency's minute
24 above (preceding note) (paragraph 1). Would you be so good as to
take the action accordingly?
2. I should be grateful if
the file could be returned for further action.
Secretary W.P.H.C.
|
37.
April 16, 1941
Note to file 4439-40 (26)
Macpherson to Hoodless
Transcript:
Principal CMS
Please see para 1 of 24
D.C.M. Macpherson
for CMA
|
38.
April 17, 1941
Note to file 4439-40 (27)
Hoodless to Macpherson
Transcript:
C.M.A.
Noted - thank you.
DW Hoodless
|
Comment:
This acknowledgment by Hoodless of Sir Harry’s request that he “retain the
remains until further notice” is the last we hear of action involving the
bones.
39.
April 18, 1941
Note to file 4439-40 (28)
Macpherson to Vaskess
Transcript:
| Secy W.P.H.C.,
Returned to you. I have read
Dr. Hoodless' report with interest and agree with his conclusions.
D.C.M. Macpherson
ACMA, Fiji
|
40.
April 28, 1941
Note to file 4439-40 (29)
Transcript:
|
Telegram to
Ag. A.O. Gardner Island No. 2 dated 28/4/41
|
40a.
April 28, 1941
Telegram No. 2 - circled 12
from Vaskess to Gallagher
Transcript:
| Confidential. Your letter of
27th December remains and sextant box received but not the sextant. Did
you forward sextant?
Secretary, W.P.H.C.
|
40b.
April 28, 1941
Telegram (not numbered) – circled 13
Gallagher to Vaskess
NOTE:
The version of this telegram in the “Tarawa File” (Gallagher’s copies) differs
slightly from the version in the W.P.H.C. file. The copy of the telegram in
Gallagher's file is the only telegram in the file that is not on a standard
government telegram form but is, instead, simply typed on a piece of paper.
It is also the only document in that file with initials and numbers written
at the bottom. They are appear to be “PAL 9/2.” Gallagher’s copy is addressed
from “The Officer-in-Charge, P.I.S.S., Gardner Island” to “The Secretary,
Western Pacific High Commission, Suva.” The W.P.H.C. copy is addressed from
“Acting Administrative Officer, Gardner Island” (an incorrect title) to “Secretary,
Western Pacific High Commission”
The transcript
of Gallagher’s copy is:
| Confidential. Your
telegram No. 2, no sextant was found. Only part discovered was thrown
away by finder but was probably part of an inverting eyepiece.
Gallagher.
|
The transcript
of the W.P.H.C. copy says:
| Confidential. Your telegram
No. 2, no sextant was found. Only part discovered was thrown away by finder
but was probably part of thread of inverted eyepiece.
Gallagher. [handwritten
note from Vaskess] (but see 1)
|
Comment:
Vaskess is referring to RC’s original telegram of October 1, 1940 which
erroneously says that a sextant was found.
Question:
Which version is correct?
|