.......... I'm confident that the shape of the debris itself is consistent with the shape of the Bevington object because it was found north of the Norwich City...........
Hmmmmm.......
A friend, a former USAF Intelligence Operations Specialist, a Photo Interpreter studied the enlargement of the photo of the Bevington object - independent without bias or clues. He saw white saltwater froth resulting from a fish or animal jumping or swimming in the water on the reef.
So I asked, "could this be part of an airplane?" Answer: "Highly unlikely. Too much whitewater froth for not enough wave/water action. It appears the object (fish?) is moving".
{I cannot attach the photo I used. A window claims the attachment can't be used..... Here is the photo title: Img_20121122_104201,jpg. It is the enlargement of the Bevington Object Glickman used during May 2012 for a presentation. It is against a maroon background.}
So, I argue that the object could be an Electra Main Gear or it could be a Fish. Or anything including a defect in the film. Another problem with the Bevington Photo that, to the best of my knowledge, has not been addressed - are the numerous anomalies on the photograph.
Now, for your statement:
"Mellow out, lads. Jeff Glickman has done a good job........." Maybe so. But we cannot be certain. Mr. Glickman's analysis has been compromised as a result of biased input from the report owner. It is my sincere hope that the report owner enlists another, outside photo expert to analyze the photograph in order to determine another, independent opinion. And in order to properly/professionally promote TIGHAR's opinion of authenticity of a main landing gear of an Electra L10E, a second unbiased analysis should be accomplished.