Looking at the entries in the pages you've posted, the dates are in sequence so no possibilty to add the entry at a later date.
Apologies If my initial post sounded critical it wasn't meant to be. You can tell by the amount of information there is on this site
that an incredible amount of time and effort has gone into the research.
O.K. I've been thinking it so I say it, I know the skeleton was incomplete, but it was a teaching hospital, how about the bones
have been used as a 'teaching skeleton'? I'm aware that the crabs damaged the bones to some extent.
Such an entry would also pre-suppose that they knew who they were burying. Inconceivable.
I agree completely. They would have to have found Amelia's bones, identified them as hers, decided to bury them under just her first name, and not mention any of this to the U.S.
I mentioned Roger finding the entry on the 50-year-old Polynesian Amelia who was buried in 1939 as an indication of how thorough his search was. This was as close as we came to finding a burial record for our Amelia--and it wasn't at all close.