Sorry Tim, but it is hard to leave your inconsistencies unchallenged.
Statement #1, Tim says:
"The same scaling tools could have been used in 2012, but apparently the lessons that should have been learned from 2010 were not. Did no one at TIGHAR take Archeology 101?"
Statement #2, Tim says:
"I suggested lasers as a possible means of establishing scale, on 12 November, 2012, after folks started sniping about lack of scale when analyzing underwater video."
In statement #1, you denigrate TIGHAR and imply that you would have done a better job of planning, but....
Statement #2 puts the lie to Statement #1 as you admit that only after the 2012 expedition did you think of lasers, so you did just as bad a job of planning as TIGHAR (and the professional subcontractors TIGHAR employed). Didn't you take Archaeology 101?
Based upon your own statements, if you sued yourself for Fraud and Negligence, you'd stand a better chance of winning the case than the current lawsuit you are engaged in.
With all due respect.
Andrew